For microplastics this week I tried the beaker method separation
(figure 1) since I finally had shaved down enough plastic to attempt it. I was
supposed to filter my sample once I was finished separating to see what percent
of microplastic we could get back but the microbiology lab needed all the
filtering equipment for the class. So I decided to leave the sample sitting and
filter another day. When I came back to the lab to filter Matt had made a
discovery! The sample had sat for two days. Our though was that all the
plastics would float because they had a lower density than the 5M NaCl
solution, but this did not happen (figure 2). Instead some of the plastics sank
to the bottom. We know that the filed plastic is a microplastic so we had to
find a solution with a higher density. This means that we have to find a cost
effective solution. Matt suggested we attempt to make a 5M NaCl and 10% sucrose
solution. This still did not have a high enough density, the highest density
that we had was 1.301 but it was with a 5M NaCl and 60% sucrose solution (figure 3), which
is not the best. We are once again stuck until we can find a good funnel to
allow to do the separation and a solution with a greater density.
Figure 1. Beaker method Seperation |
Figure 2. Sample that was left out Microplastic settled |
Figure 3. Attempt to make solution with greater density |
Pseudomonas Update: The microbiology labs did DNA extraction of their samples and we were in charge of nanodropping. The microbiology classes also ran a PCR and we were in charge of nanodropping that as well and screening them through gel electrophoresis.